Understanding Labor Market Discrimination Against Transgender People: Evidence from a Double List Experiment and a Survey
Billur Aksoy, Christopher S. Carpenter, Dario Sansone

TL;DR
This study reveals that anti-transgender attitudes in the US labor market are underreported due to social desirability bias, but actual support for transgender employment rights is much higher than perceived, highlighting the need for better awareness.
Contribution
The paper introduces a double list experiment to accurately measure anti-transgender attitudes and provides new evidence on actual support levels for transgender employment protections.
Findings
73% of people are comfortable with a transgender manager
74% support employment non-discrimination for transgender individuals
Labor market support for transgender people is lower than for gay, lesbian, and bisexual people
Abstract
Using a US nationally representative sample and a double list experiment designed to elicit views free from social desirability bias, we find that anti-transgender labor market attitudes are significantly underreported. After correcting for this concealment, we report that 73 percent of people would be comfortable with a transgender manager and 74 percent support employment non-discrimination protection for transgender people. We also show that respondents severely underestimate the population level of support for transgender individuals in the workplace, and we find that labor market support for transgender people is significantly lower than support for gay, lesbian, and bisexual people. Our results provide timely evidence on workplace-related views toward transgender people and help us better understand employment discrimination against them.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNames, Identity, and Discrimination Research · Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques · LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
