Assessing treatment effect heterogeneity in the presence of missing effect modifier data in cluster-randomized trials
Bryan S. Blette, Scott D. Halpern, Fan Li, Michael O. Harhay

TL;DR
This paper evaluates methods for assessing treatment effect heterogeneity in cluster-randomized trials with missing effect modifier data, highlighting the superior performance of multilevel and Bayesian multiple imputation techniques.
Contribution
It provides a comparison of missing data methods specifically tailored for cluster-randomized trials, an area with limited existing guidelines.
Findings
Multilevel multiple imputation outperforms other methods.
Bayesian multiple imputation shows lower bias and better coverage.
Methods are validated through simulation and real data analysis.
Abstract
Understanding whether and how treatment effects vary across subgroups is crucial to inform clinical practice and recommendations. Accordingly, the assessment of heterogeneous treatment effects (HTE) based on pre-specified potential effect modifiers has become a common goal in modern randomized trials. However, when one or more potential effect modifiers are missing, complete-case analysis may lead to bias and under-coverage. While statistical methods for handling missing data have been proposed and compared for individually randomized trials with missing effect modifier data, few guidelines exist for the cluster-randomized setting, where intracluster correlations in the effect modifiers, outcomes, or even missingness mechanisms may introduce further threats to accurate assessment of HTE. In this article, the performance of several missing data methods are compared through a simulation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference · Health disparities and outcomes
