Edge-Aware Extended Star-Tetrix Transforms for CFA-Sampled Raw Camera Image Compression

TL;DR

This paper introduces extended and edge-aware spectral-spatial transforms called XSTTs and EXSTTs for efficient compression of CFA-sampled raw camera images, improving decorrelation and compression performance without extra bits.

Contribution

It proposes novel extended and edge-aware spectral-spatial transforms that enhance raw image compression by better decorrelation, with no additional side information and minimal complexity.

Findings

EXSTTs reduce green component energy difference by up to 30%

XSTTs/EXSTTs outperform conventional methods in JPEG 2000 compression

Improved lossless and lossy compression results for high-quality camera images

Abstract

Codecs using spectral-spatial transforms efficiently compress raw camera images captured with a color filter array (CFA-sampled raw images) by changing their RGB color space into a decorrelated color space. This study describes two types of spectral-spatial transform, called extended Star-Tetrix transforms (XSTTs), and their edge-aware versions, called edge-aware XSTTs (EXSTTs), with no extra bits (side information) and little extra complexity. They are obtained by (i) extending the Star-Tetrix transform (STT), which is one of the latest spectral-spatial transforms, to a new version of our previously proposed wavelet-based spectral-spatial transform and a simpler version, (ii) considering that each 2-D predict step of the wavelet transform is a combination of two 1-D diagonal or horizontal-vertical transforms, and (iii) weighting the transforms along the edge directions in the images. Compared with XSTTs, the EXSTTs can decorrelate CFA-sampled raw images well: they reduce the difference in energy between the two green components by about $3.38$--$30.08$ \% for high-quality camera images and $8.97$--$14.47$ \% for mobile phone images. The experiments on JPEG 2000-based lossless and lossy compression of CFA-sampled raw images show better performance than conventional methods. For high-quality camera images, the XSTTs/EXSTTs produce results equal to or better than the conventional methods: especially for images with many edges, the type-I EXSTT improves them by about $0.03$--$0.19$ bpp in average lossless bitrate and the XSTTs improve them by about $0.16$--$0.96$ dB in average Bj\o ntegaard delta peak signal-to-noise ratio. For mobile phone images, our previous work perform the best, whereas the XSTTs/EXSTTs show similar trends to the case of high-quality camera images.