On the incorrect use of Carlisle's method for dichotomous variables
Daniel V. Tausk

TL;DR
This paper critiques the misuse of Carlisle's method for dichotomous variables in fraud detection, demonstrating its inaccuracies and proposing a correction to improve its validity.
Contribution
It clarifies the improper adaptation of Carlisle's method for dichotomous data and offers a simple correction to ensure accurate p-value calculations.
Findings
Naive adaptation leads to significantly incorrect p-values
Proposed correction improves the method's accuracy
Clarifies proper application of Carlisle's method for different data types
Abstract
In 2017, J. B. Carlisle has proposed a method for fraud detection in randomized controlled trials based on a comparison of reported baseline data between treatment groups. While Carlisle has only used the method for continuous variables, some authors have recently employed a naive adaption of the method for dichotomous variables. We explain why such adaptation leads to p-values that are wrong by orders of magnitude and we make a simple concrete proposal for correction of the method.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials · Advanced Causal Inference Techniques · Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
