Personalized Biopsy Schedules Using an Interval-censored Cause-specific Joint Model

TL;DR

This paper introduces a novel statistical model for creating personalized biopsy schedules in active surveillance of prostate cancer, aiming to reduce unnecessary biopsies while maintaining timely detection of progression.

Contribution

The proposed interval-censored cause-specific joint model enables personalized risk-based biopsy scheduling considering competing risks and interval censoring, improving over fixed schedules.

Findings

Personalized schedules reduce biopsies by 34%-54%.

Detection delay increases slightly with personalized schedules.

Model effectively balances biopsy frequency and detection timeliness.

Abstract

Active surveillance (AS), where biopsies are conducted to detect cancer progression, has been acknowledged as an efficient way to reduce the overtreatment of prostate cancer. Most AS cohorts use fixed biopsy schedules for all patients. However, the ideal test frequency remains unknown, and the routine use of such invasive tests burdens the patients. An emerging idea is to generate personalized biopsy schedules based on each patient's progression-specific risk. To achieve that, we propose the interval-censored cause-specific joint model (ICJM), which models the impact of longitudinal biomarkers on cancer progression while considering the competing event of early treatment initiation. The underlying likelihood function incorporates the interval-censoring of cancer progression, the competing risk of treatment, and the uncertainty about whether cancer progression occurred since the last biopsy in patients that are right-censored or experience the competing event. The model can produce patient-specific risk profiles until a horizon time. If the risk exceeds a certain threshold, a biopsy is conducted. The optimal threshold can be chosen by balancing two indicators of the biopsy schedules: the expected number of biopsies and expected delay in detection of cancer progression. A simulation study showed that our personalized schedules could considerably reduce the number of biopsies per patient by 34%-54% compared to the fixed schedules, though at the cost of a slightly longer detection delay.