Detector Requirements and Simulation Results for the EIC Exclusive, Diffractive and Tagging Physics Program using the ECCE Detector Concept
A. Bylinkin, C. T. Dean, S. Fegan, D. Gangadharan, K. Gates, S. J. D., Kay, I. Korover, W.B. Li, X. Li, R. Montgomery, D. Nguyen, G. Penman, J. R., Pybus, N. Santiesteban, R. Trotta, A. Usman, M.D. Baker, J. Frantz, D. I., Glazier, D. W. Higinbotham, T. Horn, J. Huang, G. Huber

TL;DR
This paper presents simulation studies of the ECCE detector concept for the EIC, demonstrating its capability to explore nucleon and nuclear structure through exclusive and diffractive processes, with promising results for future detector development.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed simulation-based evaluation of the ECCE detector's requirements and performance for the EIC physics program, including insights for a potential second interaction region.
Findings
ECCE detector meets the requirements for exclusive and diffractive physics studies.
Simulation results support the detector's ability to achieve high physics impact at 10-100 fb^-1.
Preliminary studies confirm technology and design suitability for the EIC physics goals.
Abstract
This article presents a collection of simulation studies using the ECCE detector concept in the context of the EIC's exclusive, diffractive, and tagging physics program, which aims to further explore the rich quark-gluon structure of nucleons and nuclei. To successfully execute the program, ECCE proposed to utilize the detecter system close to the beamline to ensure exclusivity and tag ion beam/fragments for a particular reaction of interest. Preliminary studies confirmed the proposed technology and design satisfy the requirements. The projected physics impact results are based on the projected detector performance from the simulation at 10 or 100 fb^-1 of integrated luminosity. Additionally, a few insights on the potential 2nd Interaction Region can (IR) were also documented which could serve as a guidepost for the future development of a second EIC detector.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
