Roth's Theorem implies a Weakened Version of the ABC Conjecture for Special Cases
Philipp Sibbertsen, Timm Lampert, Karsten M\"uller, Michael, Taktikos

TL;DR
This paper shows that Roth's theorem can imply a weaker, non-effective form of the ABC Conjecture for specific cases involving algebraic roots, expanding understanding of their interrelation.
Contribution
It establishes a novel implication from Roth's theorem to a weakened version of the ABC Conjecture for special algebraic cases, which was previously unexplored.
Findings
Roth's theorem implies a weakened ABC Conjecture in certain algebraic root cases
Uses explicit formulas for continued fractions of algebraic numbers
Provides new insights into the relationship between Roth's theorem and the ABC Conjecture
Abstract
Enrico Bombieri proved that the ABC Conjecture implies Roth's theorem in 1994. This paper concerns the other direction. In making use of Bombieri's and Van der Poorten's explicit formula for the coefficients of the regular continued fractions of algebraic numbers, we prove that Roth's theorem implies a weakened non-effective version of the ABC Conjecture in certain cases relating to roots.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Mathematical Identities · History and Theory of Mathematics · Analytic Number Theory Research
