Deformable Image Registration using Unsupervised Deep Learning for CBCT-guided Abdominal Radiotherapy

TL;DR

This paper introduces an unsupervised deep learning method for deformable registration of CBCT images in abdominal radiotherapy, enabling fast and accurate alignment for analyzing anatomical changes over treatment sessions.

Contribution

It proposes a novel spatial transformation network combining global and local GANs for unsupervised CBCT image registration, without needing ground truth deformation fields.

Findings

Average target registration error of 1.91 mm.

High image similarity with NCC of 0.94.

Effective alignment demonstrated on clinical CBCT data.

Abstract

CBCTs in image-guided radiotherapy provide crucial anatomy information for patient setup and plan evaluation. Longitudinal CBCT image registration could quantify the inter-fractional anatomic changes. The purpose of this study is to propose an unsupervised deep learning based CBCT-CBCT deformable image registration. The proposed deformable registration workflow consists of training and inference stages that share the same feed-forward path through a spatial transformation-based network (STN). The STN consists of a global generative adversarial network (GlobalGAN) and a local GAN (LocalGAN) to predict the coarse- and fine-scale motions, respectively. The network was trained by minimizing the image similarity loss and the deformable vector field (DVF) regularization loss without the supervision of ground truth DVFs. During the inference stage, patches of local DVF were predicted by the trained LocalGAN and fused to form a whole-image DVF. The local whole-image DVF was subsequently combined with the GlobalGAN generated DVF to obtain final DVF. The proposed method was evaluated using 100 fractional CBCTs from 20 abdominal cancer patients in the experiments and 105 fractional CBCTs from a cohort of 21 different abdominal cancer patients in a holdout test. Qualitatively, the registration results show great alignment between the deformed CBCT images and the target CBCT image. Quantitatively, the average target registration error (TRE) calculated on the fiducial markers and manually identified landmarks was 1.91+-1.11 mm. The average mean absolute error (MAE), normalized cross correlation (NCC) between the deformed CBCT and target CBCT were 33.42+-7.48 HU, 0.94+-0.04, respectively. This promising registration method could provide fast and accurate longitudinal CBCT alignment to facilitate inter-fractional anatomic changes analysis and prediction.