Planar Confluent Orthogonal Drawings of 4-Modal Digraphs
Sabine Cornelsen, Gregor Diatzko

TL;DR
This paper investigates the properties and constraints of planar confluent orthogonal drawings of 4-modal digraphs, focusing on split complexity and upwardness, to understand their structural and visual characteristics.
Contribution
It introduces new bounds and insights into the split complexity of PCODs and (quasi-)upward PCODs for different graph classes, advancing the understanding of their geometric representations.
Findings
Bounds on split complexity for various graph classes
Characterization of upward and quasi-upward PCODs
Insights into the geometric constraints of 4-modal digraphs
Abstract
In a planar confluent orthogonal drawing (PCOD) of a directed graph (digraph) vertices are drawn as points in the plane and edges as orthogonal polylines starting with a vertical segment and ending with a horizontal segment. Edges may overlap in their first or last segment, but must not intersect otherwise. PCODs can be seen as a directed variant of Kandinsky drawings or as planar L-drawings of subdivisions of digraphs. The maximum number of subdivision vertices in an edge is then the split complexity. A PCOD is upward if each edge is drawn with monotonically increasing y-coordinates and quasi-upward if no edge starts with decreasing y-coordinates. We study the split complexity of PCODs and (quasi-)upward PCODs for various classes of graphs.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputational Geometry and Mesh Generation · Digital Image Processing Techniques · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
