On the validity of the spectroscopic age indicators [Y/Mg], [Y/Al], [Y/Si], [Y/Ca], and [Y/Ti] for giant stars
Orlando J. Katime Santrich, Leandro Kerber, Yuri Abuchaim, Geraldo, Gon\c{c}alves

TL;DR
This study evaluates the effectiveness of specific yttrium-based abundance ratios as chemical clocks for giant stars in open clusters, confirming their variable reliability compared to dwarf stars and highlighting the non-universality of spectroscopic age indicators.
Contribution
It provides the first systematic validation of Y-based abundance ratios as age indicators for giant stars in open clusters, revealing their limitations and differences from dwarf star calibrations.
Findings
Y/Mg, Y/Al, Y/Si are effective for field dwarf stars.
Y/Ca and Y/Ti do not correlate with age in field giants.
Chemical clocks show high scatter at early ages.
Abstract
The abundance ratios [YMg], [YAl], [YSi], [YCa], and [YTi] have been suggested as chemical clocks for solar-metallicity dwarf stars in the field as well as for giant stars in open clusters. To verify this last hypothesis, we derive these abundances ratios of 50 giant stars belonging to seven open clusters. To calculate the abundances, we analyze FEROS spectra assuming the LTE-hypothesis. We confirm that [YMg], [YAl], [YSi], [YCa], and [YTi] work as chemical clocks for field dwarf stars at the local region (d 1 kpc) whereas for the field giants the [YMg], [YAl] and [YSi] also present trends with the ages but high scattering. [YCa] and [YTi] do not present any correlation with ages in the field giants. In Our open clusters, the behaviour is similar, [YMg], [YAl] and [YSi] present evident trends, whereas [YCa] vs. Ages is a flat…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
