G-category versus orbifold category
Andres Angel, Hellen Colman

TL;DR
This paper compares invariants of group actions and orbifolds, showing that Fadell's equivariant category matches the Lusternik-Schnirelmann category for orbifolds when the group is finite.
Contribution
It establishes the equivalence of Fadell's equivariant category and the orbifold Lusternik-Schnirelmann category for finite groups.
Findings
Fadell's equivariant category equals orbifold LS category for finite groups
Provides a bridge between group action invariants and orbifold invariants
Enhances understanding of orbifold topology in relation to group actions
Abstract
We present a comparative study of certain invariants defined for group actions and their analogues defined for orbifolds. In particular, we prove that Fadell's equivariant category for -spaces coincides with the Lusternik-Schnirelmann category for orbifolds when the group is finite.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders · Advanced Topics in Algebra
