Clairaut, Euler and the figure of the Earth
Athanase Papadopoulos (IRMA)

TL;DR
This paper reviews 18th-century debates on Earth's shape, focusing on Clairaut and Euler's contributions, and explores how this geographical question influenced advancements in mathematics, astronomy, and hydrostatics.
Contribution
It highlights the historical development of theories about Earth's figure and connects mathematical and scientific progress driven by this fundamental question.
Findings
Clairaut's work linked Earth's shape to mathematical models.
Euler's contributions advanced understanding of geodesy.
The Earth's figure debate influenced multiple scientific fields.
Abstract
The sphericity of the form of the Earth was questioned around the year 1687, primarily, by Isaac Newton who deduced from his theory of universal gravitation that the Earth has the form of a spheroid flattened at the poles and elongated at the equator. In France, somepreeminent geographers were not convinced by Newton's arguments, and about the same period, based on empirical measurements, they emitted another theory, claiming that on the contrary, the Earth has the form of a spheroid flattened at the equator and elongated at the poles. To find the real figure of the Earth became one of the major questions that were investigated by geographers, astronomers, mathematicians and other scientists in the eighteenth century, and the work done around this question had an impact on the development of all these fields. In this paper, we review the work of the eighteenth-century French…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHistorical Geography and Cartography · History and Theory of Mathematics · Historical Astronomy and Related Studies
