Confusion Matrices and Accuracy Statistics for Binary Classifiers Using Unlabeled Data: The Diagnostic Test Approach
Richard Evans

TL;DR
This paper adapts diagnostic test methods to estimate confusion matrices and accuracy for binary classifiers on unlabeled data, enabling evaluation without labeled datasets.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach to estimate confusion matrices and accuracy statistics for classifiers using unlabeled data, extending diagnostic test techniques.
Findings
Method successfully estimates confusion matrices without labeled data
Applicable to both supervised and unsupervised classifiers
Provides a new tool for classifier evaluation in unlabeled settings
Abstract
Medical researchers have solved the problem of estimating the sensitivity and specificity of binary medical diagnostic tests without gold standard tests for comparison. That problem is the same as estimating confusion matrices for classifiers on unlabeled data. This article describes how to modify the diagnostic test solutions to estimate confusion matrices and accuracy statistics for supervised or unsupervised binary classifiers on unlabeled data.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models · Machine Learning and Data Classification
MethodsTest
