Untangling the Dueling Expert Witnesses: Comparing Ensemble Methods in Pennsylvania's Redistricting Plans
P. Dingus, C. Zhu, C. Gonatas

TL;DR
This paper compares ensemble methods for analyzing Pennsylvania's legislative districts, highlighting discrepancies in expert witness testimonies and advocating for transparent, election-based metrics over proprietary data.
Contribution
It introduces a comparative analysis of ensemble methods like Redist and Gerrychain with constraints, and critiques the use of vote summation metrics in gerrymandering assessments.
Findings
Ensemble methods can produce differing results in district analysis.
Vote summation metrics are unreliable for gerrymandering detection.
Transparency is improved when using publicly available election data.
Abstract
Ensembles of random legislative districts are a valuable tool for assessing whether a proposed district plan is an outlier or gerrymander. Expert witnesses have presented these in litigation using various methods, and unsurprisingly, they often disagree. Recent open source methods now permit independent validation of expert witness testimony. Here, we compare ensembles for the Pennsylvania House and Congressional districts calculated using "Redist" and "Gerrychain" further incorporating constraints restricting county and municipal boundary splitting, as required by Pennsylvania for legal plans. We compare results to expert witness testimony submitted by Republican and Democratic parties. We confirm some of the testimony but could not reproduce all of it, struggling with metrics based on a heuristic "sum of votes index" rathern than a straightforward average of metrics across…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEconomic and Environmental Valuation · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Game Theory and Voting Systems
