Data-driven Signal Decomposition Approaches: A Comparative Analysis
Thomas Eriksen, Naveed ur Rehman

TL;DR
This paper compares various data-driven signal decomposition methods like EMD, VMD, SST, and SSA, evaluating their accuracy, robustness to noise, and parameter sensitivity through extensive experiments on synthetic and real signals.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of popular SD algorithms, highlighting their strengths, weaknesses, and best practices for parameter selection.
Findings
VMD and SST show robustness to noise in multivariate signals.
EMD is sensitive to parameter changes but effective for certain applications.
Best practices for parameter tuning improve algorithm performance.
Abstract
Signal decomposition (SD) approaches aim to decompose non-stationary signals into their constituent amplitude- and frequency-modulated components. This represents an important preprocessing step in many practical signal processing pipelines, providing useful knowledge and insight into the data and relevant underlying system(s) while also facilitating tasks such as noise or artefact removal and feature extraction. The popular SD methods are mostly data-driven, striving to obtain inherent well-behaved signal components without making many prior assumptions on input data. Among those methods include empirical mode decomposition (EMD) and variants, variational mode decomposition (VMD) and variants, synchrosqueezed transform (SST) and variants and sliding singular spectrum analysis (SSA). With the increasing popularity and utility of these methods in wide-ranging application, it is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques · Blind Source Separation Techniques
