Learning More May Not Be Better: Knowledge Transferability in Vision and Language Tasks
Tianwei Chen, Noa Garcia, Mayu Otani, Chenhui Chu, Yuta Nakashima,, Hajime Nagahara

TL;DR
This paper investigates the complexities of knowledge transferability in vision-and-language models, revealing that more data and shared tasks do not always lead to improved performance, with transfer success depending on various factors.
Contribution
It provides an exhaustive analysis of knowledge transfer in multi-modal tasks, highlighting conditions where transfer is beneficial or detrimental.
Findings
Tasks in the same group often improve each other
Dataset size influences transfer effectiveness
Pre-training stage impacts transfer success
Abstract
Is more data always better to train vision-and-language models? We study knowledge transferability in multi-modal tasks. The current tendency in machine learning is to assume that by joining multiple datasets from different tasks their overall performance will improve. However, we show that not all the knowledge transfers well or has a positive impact on related tasks, even when they share a common goal. We conduct an exhaustive analysis based on hundreds of cross-experiments on 12 vision-and-language tasks categorized in 4 groups. Whereas tasks in the same group are prone to improve each other, results show that this is not always the case. Other factors such as dataset size or pre-training stage have also a great impact on how well the knowledge is transferred.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMultimodal Machine Learning Applications · Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning · Topic Modeling
