A critical examination of relativity theories
Max Tran

TL;DR
This paper critically compares special relativity and Newtonian frameworks at first order of v/c, showing they produce identical equations for phenomena like aberration, Fresnel dragging, and Doppler effect, in an accessible manner.
Contribution
It provides a clear, first-order comparison of relativity and Newtonian physics for key phenomena, emphasizing their mathematical equivalence at this approximation level.
Findings
Both frameworks yield identical equations for the phenomena studied.
The comparison is accessible to readers with basic calculus knowledge.
Highlights the first-order equivalence of special relativity and Newtonian physics.
Abstract
We give a brief critical examination of the special theory of relativity and a similar Newtonian framework to the first order of the ratio, focusing on the phenomena of aberration, Fresnel dragging, and the Doppler effect. We will show that both frameworks yield the same equations modeling these phenomena up to first order. We do this at a level understandable to anyone with a working knowledge of calculus so that the underlying ideas do not get lost in abstruse mathematical formulations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdaptive optics and wavefront sensing · Relativity and Gravitational Theory · Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
