A comparison between compactly supported rigid and $\pmb{\mathscr{D}}$-module cohomology
Tomoyuki Abe, Christopher Lazda

TL;DR
This paper establishes a comparison theorem between rigid cohomology and arithmetic $ abla$-module cohomology by constructing a specialized functor linking constructible isocrystals to $ abla$-modules, especially for objects of Frobenius type.
Contribution
It introduces a new specialization functor from constructible isocrystals to arithmetic $ abla$-modules and proves a comparison theorem for compactly supported cohomology.
Findings
Construction of a specialization functor from isocrystals to $ abla$-modules
Identification of overholonomic $ abla$-modules for Frobenius objects
Proof of the comparison theorem for compactly supported cohomology
Abstract
The goal of this article is to prove a comparison theorem between rigid cohomology and cohomology computed using the theory of arithmetic -modules. To do this, we construct a specialisation functor from Le Stum's category of constructible isocrystals to the derived category of arithmetic -modules. For objects `of Frobenius type', we show that the essential image of this functor consists of overholonomic -modules, and lies inside the heart of the dual constructible t-structure. We use this to give a more global construction of Caro's specialisation functor for overconvergent isocrystals, which enables us to prove the comparison theorem for compactly supported cohomology.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory
