TL;DR
This paper introduces a comparison-based conversational recommender system that leverages relative user feedback and a new bandit algorithm, RelativeConUCB, to improve recommendation accuracy over traditional absolute feedback methods.
Contribution
The paper proposes a novel system enabling users to provide relative preferences and introduces the RelativeConUCB algorithm to effectively incorporate this feedback.
Findings
Outperforms existing bandit algorithms in experiments
Effectively captures and utilizes relative user preferences
Demonstrates advantages on synthetic and real-world datasets
Abstract
With the recent advances of conversational recommendations, the recommender system is able to actively and dynamically elicit user preference via conversational interactions. To achieve this, the system periodically queries users' preference on attributes and collects their feedback. However, most existing conversational recommender systems only enable the user to provide absolute feedback to the attributes. In practice, the absolute feedback is usually limited, as the users tend to provide biased feedback when expressing the preference. Instead, the user is often more inclined to express comparative preferences, since user preferences are inherently relative. To enable users to provide comparative preferences during conversational interactions, we propose a novel comparison-based conversational recommender system. The relative feedback, though more practical, is not easy to be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
