A note on incorrect inferences in non-binary qualitative probabilistic networks
Jack Storror Carter

TL;DR
This paper identifies a fundamental flaw in non-binary qualitative probabilistic networks, showing that many inferences are mathematically incorrect due to an incorrect symmetry property, and discusses potential fixes.
Contribution
It reveals a key incorrect symmetry assumption in non-binary QPNs and highlights the resulting invalid inferences, proposing possible solutions.
Findings
Many inferences in non-binary QPNs are mathematically invalid
Incorrect symmetry property causes inference errors
Discussion of potential resolutions to the problem
Abstract
Qualitative probabilistic networks (QPNs) combine the conditional independence assumptions of Bayesian networks with the qualitative properties of positive and negative dependence. They formalise various intuitive properties of positive dependence to allow inferences over a large network of variables. However, we will demonstrate in this paper that, due to an incorrect symmetry property, many inferences obtained in non-binary QPNs are not mathematically true. We will provide examples of such incorrect inferences and briefly discuss possible resolutions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Cognitive Science and Mapping · Semantic Web and Ontologies
