A deterministic counterexample for high dimensional $ L^2 L^{\infty} $ Strichartz estimates for the Wave equation
Cristian Gavrus

TL;DR
This paper provides a deterministic counterexample demonstrating the failure of certain high-dimensional $L^2 L^{ abla} $ Strichartz estimates for the Wave equation, which were previously shown to fail using probabilistic methods.
Contribution
It introduces a deterministic example that disproves the high-dimensional $L^2 L^{ abla} $ Strichartz estimates for the Wave equation, complementing prior probabilistic results.
Findings
Deterministic counterexample for $L^2 L^{ abla} $ estimates in $n \,\geq\, 4$ dimensions.
Confirms the failure of these estimates without probabilistic methods.
Highlights limitations of $L^2 L^{ abla} $ estimates in high-dimensional wave analysis.
Abstract
In this note we discuss the question of homogeneous Strichartz estimates for the Wave equation in dimensions raised by Fang and Wang and recently shown to fail by Guo, Li, Nakanishi and Yan using probability theory. We record a deterministic example for disproving this estimate.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Mathematical Physics Problems · Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques · Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
