Target Selection and Validation of DESI Emission Line Galaxies
A. Raichoor, J. Moustakas, Jeffrey A. Newman, T. Karim, S. Ahlen,, Shadab Alam, S. Bailey, D. Brooks, K. Dawson, A. de la Macorra, A. de Mattia,, A. Dey, Biprateep Dey, G. Dhungana, S. Eftekharzadeh, D. J. Eisenstein, K., Fanning, A. Font-Ribera, J. Garcia-Bellido, E. Gaztanaga

TL;DR
This paper details the selection and validation of emission line galaxy targets for DESI, demonstrating effective criteria for reliable redshift measurement across key cosmic epochs to optimize large-scale structure surveys.
Contribution
It introduces a new target selection strategy for DESI ELGs, including criteria for reliable redshift identification and performance assessment based on recent spectroscopic data.
Findings
Main ELG sample achieves over 400 deg$^{-2}$ reliable redshifts.
Selection criteria effectively distinguish redshifts in the 0.6-1.6 range.
Photometric and spectroscopic properties are characterized across the survey footprint.
Abstract
The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) will precisely constrain cosmic expansion and the growth of structure by collecting 40 million extra-galactic redshifts across 80\% of cosmic history and one third of the sky. The Emission Line Galaxy (ELG) sample, which will comprise about one-third of all DESI tracers, will be used to probe the Universe over the range, which includes the range, expected to provide the tightest constraints. We present the target selection of the DESI SV1 Survey Validation and Main Survey ELG samples, which relies on the Legacy Surveys imaging. The Main ELG selection consists of a -band magnitude cut and a vs.\ color box, while the SV1 selection explores extensions of the Main selection boundaries. The Main ELG sample is composed of two disjoint subsamples, which have target densities of about…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
