Safety Assessment for Autonomous Systems' Perception Capabilities
John Molloy, John McDermid

TL;DR
This paper adapts traditional safety analysis methods to address the unique challenges of perception systems in autonomous vehicles, considering ML limitations and environmental factors to improve safety assurance.
Contribution
It introduces a tailored safety-analysis approach for autonomous systems' perception modules, incorporating ML failure modes and environmental effects.
Findings
Proposes a modified safety analysis framework for perception systems.
Demonstrates the method with a partial analysis of a road vehicle.
Discusses applicability to various sensing modalities.
Abstract
Autonomous Systems (AS) are increasingly proposed, or used, in Safety Critical (SC) applications. Many such systems make use of sophisticated sensor suites and processing to provide scene understanding which informs the AS' decision-making. The sensor processing typically makes use of Machine Learning (ML) and has to work in challenging environments, further the ML-algorithms have known limitations,e.g., the possibility of false-negatives or false-positives in object classification. The well-established safety-analysis methods developed for conventional SC systems are not well-matched to AS, ML, or the sensing systems used by AS. This paper proposes an adaptation of well-established safety-analysis methods to address the specifics of perception-systems for AS, including addressing environmental effects and the potential failure-modes of ML, and provides a rationale for choosing…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning · Risk and Safety Analysis · Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
