A further extension of R\"odl's theorem

TL;DR

This paper extends R"odl's theorem by establishing that graphs with a limited number of induced copies of a fixed graph contain large nearly restricted induced subgraphs, unifying previous quantitative and qualitative results.

Contribution

It proves that graphs with bounded induced copies of a fixed graph have large nearly restricted induced subgraphs, generalizing and unifying earlier theorems.

Findings

Graphs with few induced copies of H have large nearly restricted subgraphs.

The result is optimal up to constants for all parameters.

Unifies previous quantitative and qualitative extensions of R"odl's theorem.

Abstract

Fix $\varepsilon>0$ and a nonnull graph $H$. A well-known theorem of R\"odl from the 80s says that every graph $G$ with no induced copy of $H$ contains a linear-sized $\varepsilon$-restricted set $S\subseteq V(G)$, which means $S$ induces a subgraph with maximum degree at most $\varepsilon\vert S\vert$ in $G$ or its complement. There are two extensions of this result: $\bullet$ quantitatively, Nikiforov (and later Fox and Sudakov) relaxed the condition "no induced copy of $H$" into "at most $\kappa\vert G\vert^{\vert H\vert}$ induced copies of $H$ for some $\kappa>0$ depending on $H$ and $\varepsilon$"; and $\bullet$ qualitatively, Chudnovsky, Scott, Seymour, and Spirkl recently showed that there exists $N>0$ depending on $H$ and $\varepsilon$ such that $G$ is $(N,\varepsilon)$-restricted, which means $V(G)$ has a partition into at most $N$ subsets that are $\varepsilon$-restricted. A natural common generalization of these two asserts that every graph $G$ with at most $\kappa\vert G\vert^{\vert H\vert}$ induced copies of $H$ is $(N,\varepsilon)$-restricted for some $\kappa,N>0$ depending on $H$ and $\varepsilon$. This is unfortunately false, but we prove that for every $\varepsilon>0$, $\kappa$ and $N$ still exist so that for every $d\ge0$, every graph with at most $\kappa d^{\vert H\vert}$ induced copies of $H$ has an $(N,\varepsilon)$-restricted induced subgraph on at least $\vert G\vert-d$ vertices. This unifies the two aforementioned theorems, and is optimal up to $\kappa$ and $N$ for every value of $d$.