Happiness Maximizing Sets under Group Fairness Constraints (Technical Report)
Jiping Zheng, Yuan Ma, Wei Ma, Yanhao Wang, Xiaoyang Wang

TL;DR
This paper introduces a fair variant of the happiness maximizing set problem that ensures group fairness constraints, proposes algorithms for two and multi-dimensional cases, and demonstrates their effectiveness through experiments.
Contribution
It formulates a fair HMS problem incorporating group fairness bounds and develops exact and approximation algorithms for different dimensions.
Findings
The FairHMS problem is NP-hard in three or more dimensions.
The IntCov algorithm efficiently solves FairHMS in two dimensions.
BiGreedy provides a bicriteria approximation for multi-dimensional FairHMS.
Abstract
Finding a happiness maximizing set (HMS) from a database, i.e., selecting a small subset of tuples that preserves the best score with respect to any nonnegative linear utility function, is an important problem in multi-criteria decision-making. When an HMS is extracted from a set of individuals to assist data-driven algorithmic decisions such as hiring and admission, it is crucial to ensure that the HMS can fairly represent different groups of candidates without bias and discrimination. However, although the HMS problem was extensively studied in the database community, existing algorithms do not take group fairness into account and may provide solutions that under-represent some groups. In this paper, we propose and investigate a fair variant of HMS (FairHMS) that not only maximizes the minimum happiness ratio but also guarantees that the number of tuples chosen from each group falls…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Voting Systems · Multi-Criteria Decision Making · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
