Report of the Snowmass 2021 Collider Implementation Task Force
Thomas Roser, Reinhard Brinkmann, Sarah Cousineau, Dmitri Denisov,, Spencer Gessner, Steve Gourlay, Philippe Lebrun, Meenakshi Narain, Katsunobu, Oide, Tor Raubenheimer, John Seeman, Vladimir Shiltsev, Jim Strait, Marlene, Turner, Lian-Tao Wang

TL;DR
This report evaluates proposed future collider projects using standardized metrics to compare performance, technology readiness, schedule, cost, and environmental impact, covering a range of accelerator types and technologies.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive set of metrics and evaluation processes for comparing future collider proposals across various technological and performance parameters.
Findings
Developed uniform comparison metrics for collider proposals.
Provided evaluations of multiple future collider projects.
Assessed technology readiness and environmental impacts.
Abstract
The Snowmass 2021 Implementation Task Force has been established to evaluate the proposed future accelerator projects for performance, technology readiness, schedule, cost, and environmental impact. Corresponding metrics has been developed for uniform comparison of the proposals ranging from Higgs/EW factories to multi-TeV lepton, hadron and ep collider facilities, based on traditional and advanced acceleration technologies. This report documents the metrics and processes, and presents evaluations of future colliders performed by Implementation Task Force.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
