The Relative Importance of Depth Cues and Semantic Edges for Indoor Mobility Using Simulated Prosthetic Vision in Immersive Virtual Reality
Alex Rasla, Michael Beyeler

TL;DR
This study evaluates the importance of depth cues versus semantic edges in simulated prosthetic vision within immersive VR, finding depth cues more effective for obstacle avoidance and highlighting the benefit of flexible switching modes.
Contribution
It introduces a neurobiologically inspired model of simulated prosthetic vision combining depth and semantic edge cues, testing their effectiveness in VR for mobility tasks.
Findings
Depth cues significantly improve obstacle avoidance.
Participants preferred the ability to switch between depth and edge modes.
Depth-based cues outperform semantic edges in supporting mobility.
Abstract
Visual neuroprostheses (bionic eyes) have the potential to treat degenerative eye diseases that often result in low vision or complete blindness. These devices rely on an external camera to capture the visual scene, which is then translated frame-by-frame into an electrical stimulation pattern that is sent to the implant in the eye. To highlight more meaningful information in the scene, recent studies have tested the effectiveness of deep-learning based computer vision techniques, such as depth estimation to highlight nearby obstacles (DepthOnly mode) and semantic edge detection to outline important objects in the scene (EdgesOnly mode). However, nobody has attempted to combine the two, either by presenting them together (EdgesAndDepth) or by giving the user the ability to flexibly switch between them (EdgesOrDepth). Here, we used a neurobiologically inspired model of simulated…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
