Benchmarking MESA isochrones against the Hyades single star sequence
Wolfgang Brandner, Per Calissendorff, Taisiya Kopytova

TL;DR
This study evaluates MESA stellar evolution models against the Hyades cluster's single star sequence using Gaia EDR3 data, revealing good fits for certain mass ranges and highlighting areas needing model improvements.
Contribution
The paper benchmarks MESA models against high-precision Gaia data for the Hyades, identifying specific mass ranges where models succeed or underperform, and suggests improvements for future stellar model grids.
Findings
MESA models fit well for stars above 0.85 M$_\odot$ and below 0.25 M$_\odot$
Models systematically underpredict luminosity for 0.25-0.85 M$_\odot$ stars
Convective kissing instability may cause scatter in low-mass stars
Abstract
Based on GAIA EDR3, we revisit and update our sample of bonafide single stars in the Hyades open cluster. The small observational uncertainties in parallax and photometry of EDR3 result in a tightly defined stellar sequence, which is ideal for the testing and calibration of theoretical stellar evolutionary tracks and isochrones. We benchmark the solar-scaled MESA evolutionary models against the single star sequence. We find that the non-rotating MESA models for [Fe/H] = +0.25 provide a good fit for stars with masses above 0.85, and very low mass stars below 0.25 M. For stars with masses between 0.25 and 0.85 M the models systematically under predict the observed stellar luminosity. One potential limitation of the models for partially convective stars more massive than 0.35 M is the prescription of (superadiabatic) convection with the mixing-length theory…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
