The origin of the vanishing soft X-ray excess in the changing-look Active Galactic Nucleus Mrk 590

TL;DR

This study investigates the origin and disappearance of the soft X-ray excess in the changing-look AGN Mrk 590 over two decades, analyzing multi-wavelength data to evaluate models explaining this phenomenon.

Contribution

The paper provides extensive spectral analysis of Mrk 590, testing warm Comptonization and ionized disk reflection models, and concludes these may not fully explain the vanishing soft excess.

Findings

Soft X-ray excess vanished after 2004 and did not reappear.

Significant variability in optical-UV and X-ray flux observed.

No correlation between Eddington rate and soft excess.

Abstract

We have studied the nature and origin of the soft X-ray excess detected in the interesting changing-look AGN (CLAGN) Mrk~590 using two decades of multi-wavelength observations from \xmm{}, \suzaku{}, \swift{} and \nustar{}. In the light of vanishing soft excess in this CLAGN, we test two models, "the warm Comptonization" and "the ionized disk reflection" using extensive UV/X-ray spectral analysis. Our main findings are: (1) the soft X-ray excess emission, last observed in 2004, vanished in 2011, and never reappeared in any of the later observations, (2) we detected a significant variability ($\sim300\%$) in the observed optical-UV and power-law flux between observations with the lowest state ($L_{\rm bol} = 4.4\times 10^{43}\, erg\, s^{-1}$, in 2016) and the highest state ($L_{\rm bol} = 1.2\times 10^{44}\, erg\, s^{-1}$, in 2018), (3) the UV and power-law fluxes follow same temporal pattern, (4) the photon index showed a significant variation ($\Gamma=1.88^{+0.02}_{-0.08}$ and $\Gamma=1.58^{+0.02}_{-0.03}$ in 2002 and 2021 respectively) between observations, (5) no Compton hump was detected in the source spectra but a narrow Fe$K_{\alpha}$ line is present in all observations, (6) we detected a high-energy cut-off in power-law continuum ($92^{+55}_{-25} \rm keV$ and $60^{+10}_{-08} \rm keV$) with the latest \nustar{} observations, (7) the warm Comptonization model needs an additional diskbb component to describe the source UV bump, (8) there is no correlation between the Eddington rate and the soft excess as found in other changing-look AGNs. We conclude that given the spectral variability in UV/X-rays, the ionized disk reflection or the warm Comptonization models may not be adequate to describe the vanishing soft excess feature observed in Mrk~590.