The cold gas and dust properties of red star-forming galaxies
Ryan Chown, Laura C. Parker, Christine D. Wilson, Toby Brown, Fraser, A. Evans, Yang Gao, Ho Seong Hwang, Lihwai Lin, Amelie Saintonge, Mark, Sargent, Matthew W. L. Smith, Ting Xiao

TL;DR
This study investigates the cold gas and dust properties of red star-forming galaxies, revealing they are likely quenching due to limited gas supply, with distinct molecular gas and dust characteristics compared to blue star-forming galaxies.
Contribution
It provides new observational data on cold gas and dust in red misfit galaxies and compares these properties to blue galaxies, highlighting differences in gas content and depletion times.
Findings
Red misfits have longer molecular gas depletion times.
They possess lower molecular and total gas mass fractions.
They show a flatter slope in the $ ext{log} M_ ext{mol}$-$ ext{log} M_ ext{star}$ plane.
Abstract
We study the cold gas and dust properties for a sample of red star forming galaxies called "red misfits." We collect single-dish CO observations and HI observations from representative samples of low-redshift galaxies, as well as our own JCMT CO observations of red misfits. We also obtain SCUBA-2 850 um observations for a subset of these galaxies. With these data we compare the molecular gas, total cold gas, and dust properties of red misfits against those of their blue counterparts ("blue actives") taking non-detections into account using a survival analysis technique. We compare these properties at fixed position in the log SFR-log M* plane, as well as versus offset from the star-forming main sequence. Compared to blue actives, red misfits have slightly longer molecular gas depletion times, similar total gas depletion times, significantly lower molecular- and total-gas mass fractions,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
