Does the Catalog of California Earthquakes, with Aftershocks Included, Contain Information about Future Large Earthquakes?
John B. Rundle, Andrea Donnellan, Geoffrey Fox, Lisa Grant Ludwig and, James Crutchfield

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that earthquake catalogs, including aftershocks, contain valuable information about future large earthquakes, challenging the idea that such events are entirely unpredictable.
Contribution
It applies machine learning to earthquake catalogs to reveal their potential in predicting large earthquakes, showing they hold significant information about future hazards.
Findings
Earthquake catalogs contain predictive information about large earthquakes.
Machine learning enhances understanding of earthquake predictability.
Major earthquakes are not entirely random and can be informed by catalog data.
Abstract
Yes. Interval statistics have been used to conclude that major earthquakes are random events in time and cannot be anticipated or predicted. Machine learning is a powerful new technique that enhances our ability to understand the information content of earthquake catalogs. We show that catalogs contain significant information on current hazard and future predictability for large earthquakes.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSeismology and Earthquake Studies · Earthquake Detection and Analysis · Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
