Generalized Estimators, Slope, Efficiency, and Fisher Information Bounds
Paul W. Vos

TL;DR
This paper introduces generalized estimators with parameter-invariant distributions, defines a slope measure for comparing estimators regardless of bias, and establishes a bound between Fisher information and this slope, extending efficiency concepts.
Contribution
It proposes generalized estimators that always exist and are unique, introduces a bias-invariant slope measure for estimator comparison, and links Fisher information to this slope without requiring large samples.
Findings
The slope $\Lambda$ can compare biased and unbiased estimators.
Fisher information $I$ bounds the slope $\Lambda$ for all sample sizes.
$\Lambda$-efficiency extends traditional efficiency to biased estimators.
Abstract
Point estimators may not exist, need not be unique, and their distributions are not parameter invariant. Generalized estimators provide distributions that are parameter invariant, unique, and exist when point estimates do not. Comparing point estimators using variance is less useful when estimators are biased. A squared slope is defined that can be used to compare both point and generalized estimators and is unaffected by bias. Fisher information and variance are fundamentally different quantities: the latter is defined at a distribution that need not belong to a family, while the former cannot be defined without a family of distributions, . Fisher information and are similar quantities as both are defined on the tangent bundle and provides an upper bound, , that holds for all sample sizes -- asymptotics are not required. Comparing…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods and Inference · Advanced Statistical Methods and Models · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
