On the Distributional Robustness of Finite Rational Inattention Models
Emerson Melo

TL;DR
This paper analyzes how decision makers using rational inattention models can achieve robustness against uncertainty in prior distributions, providing a tractable way to characterize and quantify the impact of prior ambiguity.
Contribution
It introduces a full characterization of distributional robustness in rational inattention models via a concave program and defines the concept of Worst-Case Sensitivity.
Findings
Characterization of robust consideration sets
Necessary and sufficient conditions for robustness
Quantification of prior uncertainty impact
Abstract
In this paper we study a rational inattention model in environments where the decision maker faces uncertainty about the true prior distribution over states. The decision maker seeks to select a stochastic choice rule over a finite set of alternatives that is robust to prior ambiguity. We fully characterize the distributional robustness of the rational inattention model in terms of a tractable concave program. We establish necessary and sufficient conditions to construct robust consideration sets. Finally, we quantify the impact of prior uncertainty, by introducing the notion of \emph{Worst-Case Sensitivity}.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Risk and Portfolio Optimization
