The Properties of Low-Redshift FeLoBAL Quasars: III. The Location and Geometry of the Outflows
Hyunseop Choi, Karen M. Leighly, Collin Dabbieri, Donald M. Terndrup,, Sarah C. Gallagher, Gordon T. Richards

TL;DR
This study investigates the properties, locations, and geometries of outflows in low-redshift FeLoBAL quasars, revealing correlations with accretion rates, outflow velocities, and emission features, and proposing different mechanisms for various quasar types.
Contribution
It provides new insights into the relationship between outflow velocities, accretion rates, and outflow locations, and explores the connection between BAL outflows and [O III] emission in FeLoBAL quasars.
Findings
High-velocity outflows are found at parsec scales in high accretion rate quasars.
Outflow velocity correlates with Eddington ratio, with scatter linked to launch radius.
[O III] emission properties depend on BAL location and Seyfert type, with hidden broad components in some cases.
Abstract
We present continued analysis of a sample of low-redshift iron low-ionization broad absorption-line quasars (FeLoBALQs). Choi et al. (2022) presented spectral analysis of BAL outflows in 50 objects. Leighly et al. (2022) analyzed optical emission lines of 30 of those 50 objects and found that they are characterized by either a high accretion rate () or low accretion rate (). We report that the outflow velocity is inversely correlated with the BAL location among the high accretion rate objects, with the highest velocities observed in the parsec-scale outflows. In contrast, the low Eddington ratio objects showed the opposite trend. We confirmed the known relationship between outflow velocity and , and found that the scatter plausibly originates in the force multiplier (launch…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
