The Legendre Approximation and Arithmetic Bias
Ghaith Hiary, Megan Paasche

TL;DR
This paper explores the historical and mathematical significance of Legendre's prime counting formula, highlighting the role of arithmetic bias and analyzing the Legendre constant's properties and origins.
Contribution
It reveals how arithmetic bias influenced Legendre's formula and introduces a natural criterion related to the Legendre constant, offering insights into its historical development.
Findings
Arithmetic bias likely influenced Legendre's formula.
The Legendre constant 1.08366 satisfies a natural criterion.
Conjecture on how Legendre arrived at the erroneous constant.
Abstract
An interesting episode in the history of the prime number theorem concerns a formula proposed by Legendre for counting the primes below a given bound. We point out that arithmetic bias likely played an important role in arriving at that formula and in its subsequent widespread, decades-long recognition. We also show that the Legendre constant 1.08366 satisfies a certain simple and natural criterion, and conjecture that this criterion is how Legendre arrived at that erroneous constant in his formula.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHistory and Theory of Mathematics
