On the history of Lie brackets, crossed modules, and Lie-Rinehart algebras
Johannes Huebschmann

TL;DR
This paper traces the historical development of Lie brackets, crossed modules, and Lie-Rinehart algebras, highlighting their interconnected evolution across group theory, homotopy, and algebraic structures over time.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive historical overview of the development and interrelations of Lie brackets, crossed modules, and Lie-Rinehart algebras, emphasizing forgotten and parallel discoveries.
Findings
Historical connections between group theory and homotopy via Whitehead product.
Development of crossed modules in topology and group extensions.
Parallel evolution of Lie algebra concepts and their algebraic structures.
Abstract
The aim here is to sketch the development of ideas related to brackets and similar concepts: Some purely group theoretical combinatorics due to Ph. Hall led to a proof of the Jacobi identity for the Whitehead product in homotopy theory. Whitehead introduced crossed modules to characterize a second relative homotopy group; guided by combinatorial group theory considerations, Reidemeister and Peiffer explored this kind of structure to develop normal forms for the decomposition of a 3-manifold; but crossed modules are also lurking behind a forgotten approach of Turing to the extension problem for groups: Turing concocted the obstruction 3-cocycle isolated later by Eilenberg-Mac Lane and already proved the Eilenberg-Mac Lane theorem to the effect that the vanishing of the class of that cocycle is equivalent to the existence of a solution for the corresponding extension problem. This Turing…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
