Bootstrap inference in the presence of bias
Giuseppe Cavaliere, S\'ilvia Gon\c{c}alves, Morten {\O}rregaard, Nielsen, Edoardo Zanelli

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that bootstrap methods, when properly implemented with prepivoting, can provide valid inference even for biased estimators, across various complex models.
Contribution
It introduces a bootstrap approach using prepivoting to achieve valid inference with biased estimators, including practical implementations and general conditions.
Findings
Prepivoting restores bootstrap validity for biased estimators.
Two implementations: plug-in and double bootstrap.
Applicable to diverse models like nonparametric regression and panel data.
Abstract
We consider bootstrap inference for estimators which are (asymptotically) biased. We show that, even when the bias term cannot be consistently estimated, valid inference can be obtained by proper implementations of the bootstrap. Specifically, we show that the prepivoting approach of Beran (1987, 1988), originally proposed to deliver higher-order refinements, restores bootstrap validity by transforming the original bootstrap p-value into an asymptotically uniform random variable. We propose two different implementations of prepivoting (plug-in and double bootstrap), and provide general high-level conditions that imply validity of bootstrap inference. To illustrate the practical relevance and implementation of our results, we discuss five examples: (i) inference on a target parameter based on model averaging; (ii) ridge-type regularized estimators; (iii) nonparametric regression; (iv) a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods and Inference · Spatial and Panel Data Analysis · Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
