Transfer learning for affordable and high quality tunneling splittings from instanton calculations
Silvan K\"aser, Jeremy O. Richardson, Markus Meuwly

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that transfer learning combined with ring-polymer instanton theory can accurately predict tunneling splittings in molecules like malonaldehyde using significantly fewer high-level calculations, making high-accuracy quantum predictions more affordable.
Contribution
The study introduces a transfer learning approach that reduces the number of high-level electronic structure calculations needed for accurate tunneling splitting predictions in instanton calculations.
Findings
Only 25-50 high-level data points are needed for CCSD(T)-level accuracy.
The high-level PES has a mean error of 0.3 kcal/mol for energies up to 40 kcal/mol.
Tunneling splittings are accurately predicted within 2 cm$^{-1}$ of high-level calculations.
Abstract
The combination of transfer learning (TL) a low level potential energy surface (PES) to a higher level of electronic structure theory together with ring-polymer instanton (RPI) theory is explored and applied to malonaldehyde. The RPI approach provides a semiclassical approximation of the tunneling splitting and depends sensitively on the accuracy of the PES. With second order M{\o}ller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2) as the low-level (LL) model and energies and forces from coupled cluster singles, doubles and perturbative triples (CCSD(T)) as the high-level (HL) model, it is demonstrated that CCSD(T) information from only 25 to 50 judiciously selected structures along and around the instanton path suffice to reach HL-accuracy for the tunneling splitting. In addition, the global quality of the HL-PES is demonstrated through a mean average error of 0.3 kcal/mol for energies up to 40…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
