Airfall on Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko
B. J. R. Davidsson, S. Birch, G. A. Blake, D. Bodewits, J. P. Dworkin,, D. P. Glavin, Y. Furukawa, J. I. Lunine, J. L. Mitchell, A. N. Nguyen, S., Squyres, A. Takigawa, J.-B. Vincent, K. Zacny

TL;DR
This study models the transfer and deposition of material on comet 67P, quantifying debris layer thickness, volatile loss, and activity potential across different regions using numerical simulations.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive simulation framework to analyze airfall processes, ice preservation, and activity potential on comet 67P, providing new insights into surface evolution.
Findings
Airfall layer thickness varies from 0.1 to 1 meter depending on location.
Water ice can be preserved in small aggregates during transfer.
CO2 is rapidly lost and unlikely to be present in airfall deposits.
Abstract
We here study the transfer process of material from one hemisphere to the other (deposition of airfall material) on an active comet nucleus, specifically 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. Our goals are to: 1) quantify the thickness of the airfall debris layers and how it depends on the location of the target area, 2) determine the amount of and ice that are lost from icy dust assemblages of different sizes during transfer through the coma, and 3) estimate the relative amount of vapor loss in airfall material after deposition in order to understand what locations are expected to be more active than others on the following perihelion approach. We use various numerical simulations, that include orbit dynamics, thermophysics of the nucleus and of individual coma aggregates, coma gas kinetics and hydrodynamics, as well as dust dynamics due to gas drag, to address…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
