Cluster Cepheids with High Precision Gaia Parallaxes, Low Zeropoint Uncertainties, and Hubble Space Telescope Photometry
Adam G. Riess, Louise Breuval, Wenlong Yuan, Stefano Casertano, Lucas, M.~Macri, Dan Scolnic, Tristan Cantat-Gaudin, Richard I. Anderson, Mauricio, Cruz Reyes

TL;DR
This study uses high-precision Gaia parallaxes and HST photometry of Cepheids in clusters to refine the cosmic distance scale and measure the Hubble constant, revealing persistent tension with CMB-based estimates.
Contribution
It provides a new, precise calibration of Cepheid luminosities using cluster parallaxes, reducing uncertainties in H_0 and highlighting the tension with Planck measurements.
Findings
Gaia parallaxes show no residual offset in the studied magnitude range.
Cepheid luminosity calibration yields H_0 around 73 km/s/Mpc.
The tension between local and CMB measurements of H_0 remains significant.
Abstract
We present HST photometry of 17 Cepheids in open clusters and their mean parallaxes from Gaia EDR3. These parallaxes are more precise than those from individual Cepheids (G<8 mag) previously used to measure the Hubble constant because they are derived from an average of >300 stars per cluster. Cluster parallaxes also have smaller systematic uncertainty because their stars lie in the range (G>13 mag) where the Gaia parallax calibration is most comprehensive. Cepheid photometry employed in the period--luminosity relation was measured using the same instrument(WFC3) and filters(F555W,F814W,F160W) as extragalactic Cepheids in SNIa hosts. We find no evidence of residual parallax offset in this magnitude range, zp=-3+/-4 muas, consistent with Lindegren:2021b and most studies. The Cepheid luminosity (P=10d, solar-metallicity) in the HST near-infrared, Wesenheit system derived from the cluster…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
