The Frauchiger-Renner Gedanken Experiment: Flaws in Its Analysis -- How Logic Works in Quantum Mechanics
Stuart Samuel

TL;DR
This paper critically analyzes the Frauchiger-Renner gedanken experiment, revealing logical flaws such as non-transitivity in quantum mechanics and demonstrating the limitations of Wigner/friend experiments on macroscopic systems.
Contribution
It identifies and explains logical inconsistencies in the original analysis and explores the implications of these flaws for understanding quantum logic and measurement.
Findings
Quantum mechanics does not obey transitivity in certain logical inferences.
Some premises in the Frauchiger-Renner experiment are logically incompatible.
Wigner/friend experiments are impossible on macroscopic objects.
Abstract
In a publication (Nature Comm. 3711, 9 (2018)), Daniela Frauchiger and Renato Renner used a Wigner/friend gedanken experiment to argue that quantum mechanics cannot describe complex systems involving measuring agents. They were able to produce a contradictory statement starting with four statements about measurements performed on an entangled spin system. These statements needed to be combined using the transitive property of logic: If A implies B and B implies C, then A implies C. However, in combining successive statements for the Frauchiger-Renner gedanken experiment we show that quantum mechanics does not obey transitivity and that this invalidates their analysis. We also demonstrate that certain pairs of premises among the four statements are logically incompatible, meaning that the statements cannot all be used at once. In addition, to produce the contradiction, Frauchiger and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications
