Nonproliferation and fusion power plants
Michael Y. Hua, Sachin S. Desai, Amy C. Roma, Angela Di Fulvio, Craig, J. Mundie, Sara A. Pozzi

TL;DR
This paper argues that nuclear nonproliferation laws do not legally apply to fusion power plants and suggests that existing export controls are more appropriate for managing fusion's proliferation risks.
Contribution
It provides a legal and technical analysis showing fusion's exemption from nonproliferation regime and proposes a controls-by-design approach for fusion regulation.
Findings
Legal non-applicability of nonproliferation regime to fusion.
Fusion should be regulated by export controls, not nonproliferation laws.
Supports development of a usage-based control regime for fusion.
Abstract
This is an abridged abstract; please see the full paper. This paper evaluates whether the nuclear nonproliferation regime applies to fusion power plants and finds that, legally, the regime does not apply. The paper then examines whether the nonproliferation regime should apply to fusion based on a technical evaluation. The paper concludes that fusion should continue to fall outside the nonproliferation regime and that the global, dual-use export control regime, including potentially developing a "controls by design" usage-based control regime, is better suited for commercial fusion energy.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsKorean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies · Nuclear Issues and Defense · Economic Sanctions and International Relations
