Linking number obstructions to satellite homomorphisms
Tye Lidman, Allison N. Miller, Juanita Pinz\'on-Caicedo

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that certain satellite operations in knot theory are not homomorphisms, using $d$-invariants of branched covers, and introduces a related technical result involving the Torelli group.
Contribution
It establishes new obstructions to satellite operations being homomorphisms and links $d$-invariants to the Torelli group, advancing understanding in knot concordance.
Findings
Satellite operations with specific positivity and winding number are not homomorphisms.
A new relation between $d$-invariants and the Torelli group is proved.
The results provide new tools for studying knot concordance and satellite operations.
Abstract
We prove that satellite operations that satisfy a certain positivity condition and have winding number other than one are not homomorphisms. The argument uses the -invariants of branched covers. In the process, we prove a technical result relating -invariants and the Torelli group which may be of independent interest.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems · Analytic Number Theory Research
