Ties in ranking scores can be treated as weighted samples
Mark Tygert

TL;DR
This paper introduces a method to treat tied ranking scores as weighted samples by constructing a weighted dataset with unique scores, simplifying the analysis of cumulative statistics without random perturbations.
Contribution
It presents a novel approach to handle tied scores by constructing a weighted dataset with unique scores, eliminating the need for random perturbations in cumulative statistics analysis.
Findings
Weighted dataset construction ensures score uniqueness
Reduces analysis of tied scores to weighted sample analysis
Simplifies cumulative statistics computation without perturbations
Abstract
Prior proposals for cumulative statistics suggest making tiny random perturbations to the scores (independent variables in a regression) in order to ensure the scores' uniqueness. Uniqueness means that no score for any member of the population or subpopulation being analyzed is exactly equal to any other member's score. It turns out to be possible to construct from the original data a weighted data set that modifies the scores, weights, and responses (dependent variables in the regression) such that the new scores are unique and (together with the new weights and responses) yield the desired cumulative statistics for the original data. This reduces the problem of analyzing data with scores that may not be unique to the problem of analyzing a weighted data set with scores that are unique by construction. Recent proposals for cumulative statistics have already detailed how to process…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMulti-Criteria Decision Making
