On the stability of tidal streams in action space
Arpit Arora, Robyn E. Sanderson, Nondh Panithanpaisal, Emily C., Cunningham, Andrew Wetzel, Nicol\'as Garavito-Camargo

TL;DR
This paper compares static and time-evolving gravitational models for the Milky Way, showing that time-evolving models better preserve the coherence of tidal streams in action space over time.
Contribution
It demonstrates that time-evolving potentials are essential for accurately tracking tidal streams over Gyr timescales, especially in systems with merger activity.
Findings
Time-evolving models preserve action space coherence longer than static models.
Static models can mischaracterize stellar orbits as early as 0.5-1 Gyr ago.
Merger history significantly affects the accuracy of static potential models.
Abstract
In the Gaia era it is increasingly apparent that traditional static, parameterized models are insufficient to describe the mass distribution of our complex, dynamically evolving Milky Way (MW). In this work, we compare different time-evolving and time-independent representations of the gravitational potentials of simulated MW-mass galaxies from the FIRE-2 suite of cosmological baryonic simulations. Using these potentials, we calculate actions for star particles in tidal streams around three galaxies with varying merger histories at each snapshot from 7 Gyr ago to the present day. We determine the action-space coherence preserved by each model using the Kullback-Leibler Divergence to gauge the degree of clustering in actions and the relative stability of the clusters over time. We find that all models produce a clustered action space for simulations with no significant mergers. However,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
