Algebraic independence and difference equations over elliptic function fields
Ehud de Shalit

TL;DR
This paper proves a dichotomy for solutions of linear difference equations over elliptic function fields, showing they are either algebraically independent or belong to a specific elliptic function ring.
Contribution
It establishes an elliptic analogue of a recent theorem, characterizing algebraic independence of solutions over elliptic function fields.
Findings
Solutions are either algebraically independent or belong to a specific elliptic function ring.
The result extends difference equation theory to elliptic function fields.
Provides a dichotomy similar to rational function case, but in elliptic setting.
Abstract
For a lattice \Lambda in the complex plane, let K_{\Lambda} be the field of \Lambda-elliptic functions. For two relatively prime integers p (respectively q) greater than 1, consider the endomorphisms \psi (resp. \phi) of K_{\Lambda} given by multiplication by p (resp. q) on the elliptic curve \mathbb{C}/\Lambda. We prove that if f (resp. g) are complex Laurent power series that satisfy linear difference equations over K_{\Lambda} with respect to \phi (resp. \psi) then there is a dichotomy. Either, for some sublattice \Lambda' of \Lambda, one of f or g belongs to the ring K_{\Lambda'}[z,z^{-1},\zeta(z,\Lambda')], where \zeta(z,\Lambda') is the Weierstrass zeta function, or f and g are algebraically independent over K_{\Lambda}. This is an elliptic analogue of a recent theorem of Adamczewski, Dreyfus, Hardouin and Wibmer (over the field of rational functions).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMeromorphic and Entire Functions · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
