Metallicities and ages for star clusters and their surrounding fields in the Large Magellanic Cloud

TL;DR

This study analyzes 147 star clusters in the Large Magellanic Cloud to determine their ages and metallicities, constructing an age-metallicity relation and comparing it with models and other galaxies, revealing insights into the galaxy's chemical evolution.

Contribution

First comprehensive determination of ages and metallicities for a large sample of LMC clusters, including many for the first time, and comparison with theoretical models and other galaxies.

Findings

Old, metal-poor clusters are found both inside and outside the bar.

Most clusters younger than 1 Gyr are located in the bar.

The derived age-metallicity relation agrees with models and literature.

Abstract

We study 147 star clusters in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) in order to determine their mean metallicities and ages, as well as the mean metallicities of 80 surrounding fields. We construct an age-metallicity relation (AMR) for the clusters in the LMC. For this purpose, we used Str\"omgren photometry obtained with the SOI camera on the 4.1 m SOAR telescope. We found the mean metallicity and age for 110 star clusters. For the remaining 37, we provide an age estimation only. To the best of our knowledge, for 29 clusters from our sample, we provide both the metallicity and age for the first time, whereas for 66 clusters, we provide a first determination of the metallicity, and for 43 clusters, the first estimation of the age. We also calculated the mean metallicities for stars from 80 fields around the clusters. The old, metal-poor star clusters occur both in and out of the LMC bar region, while intermediate-age clusters are located mostly outside of the bar. The majority of star clusters younger than 1 Gyr are located in the bar region. We find a good agreement between our AMR and theoretical models of the LMC chemical enrichment, as well as with AMRs for clusters from the literature. Next, we took advantage of 26 stellar clusters from our sample which host Cepheid variables and used them as an independent check of the correctness of our age determination procedure. We used period-age relations for Cepheids to calculate the mean age of a given cluster and compared it with the age obtained from isochrone fitting. We find good agreement between these ages, especially for models taking into account additional physical processes (e.g., rotation). We also compared the AMR of the LMC and Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) derived in a uniform way and we note that they indicate possible former interaction between these two galaxies.