Interference and Need Aware Workload Colocation in Hyperscale Datacenters

TL;DR

This paper proposes a tunable resource allocation approach for hyperscale datacenters that balances operational efficiency and SLO guarantees by accounting for workload interference and platform heterogeneity.

Contribution

It introduces a novel, tunable resource management method combining online service classification and offline sensitivity analysis for improved workload colocation.

Findings

Up to 50% reduction in required machines when tuning for efficiency.

Up to 40% reduction in TCO and 60% reduction in resource fragmentation.

SLO violations can be reduced by 22% with interference-aware colocation.

Abstract

Datacenters suffer from resource utilization inefficiencies due to the conflicting goals of service owners and platform providers. Service owners intending to maintain Service Level Objectives (SLO) for themselves typically request a conservative amount of resources. Platform providers want to increase operational efficiency to reduce capital and operating costs. Achieving both operational efficiency and SLO for individual services at the same time is challenging due to the diversity in service workload characteristics, resource usage patterns that are dependent on input load, heterogeneity in platform, memory, I/O, and network architecture, and resource bundling. This paper presents a tunable approach to resource allocation that accounts for both dynamic service resource needs and platform heterogeneity. In addition, an online K-Means-based service classification method is used in conjunction with an offline sensitivity component. Our tunable approach allows trading resource utilization efficiency for absolute SLO guarantees based on the service owners' sensitivity to its SLO. We evaluate our tunable resource allocator at scale in a private cloud environment with mostly latency-critical workloads. When tuning for operational efficiency, we demonstrate up to ~50% reduction in required machines; ~40% reduction in Total-Cost-of-Ownership (TCO); and ~60% reduction in CPU and memory fragmentation, but at the cost of increasing the number of tasks experiencing degradation of SLO by up to ~25% compared to the baseline. When tuning for SLO, by introducing interference-aware colocation, we can tune the solver to reduce tasks experiencing degradation of SLO by up to ~22% compared to the baseline, but at an additional cost of ~30% in terms of the number of hosts. We highlight this trade-off between TCO and SLO violations, and offer tuning based on the requirements of the platform owners.