TL;DR
The paper discusses a successful, low-effort transition to remote embedded systems teaching during COVID-19, highlighting remote hardware access as a viable alternative to traditional in-person labs.
Contribution
It provides a detailed evaluation of remote hardware access for embedded systems education, demonstrating its effectiveness and ease of implementation during abrupt course transitions.
Findings
Remote hardware access is a viable teaching method.
The approach requires minimal maintenance and existing open technologies.
Both students and teachers found the method effective.
Abstract
Due to the pandemic of COVID-19, many university courses had to abruptly transform to enable remote teaching. Adjusting courses on embedded systems and micro-controllers was extra challenging since interaction with real hardware is their integral part. We start by comparing our experience with four basic alternatives of teaching embedded systems: 1) interacting with hardware at school, 2) having remote access to hardware, 3) lending hardware to students for at-home work and 4) virtualizing hardware. Afterward, we evaluate in detail our experience of the fast transition from traditional, offline at-school hardware programming course to using remote access to real hardware present in the lab. The somewhat unusual remote hardware access approach turned out to be a fully viable alternative for teaching embedded systems, enabling a relatively low-effort transition. Our setup is based on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
