Exploring Financial Networks Using Quantile Regression and Granger Causality

TL;DR

This paper introduces a novel tail-based Granger causality method using quantile regression to analyze systemic risk in financial networks, providing more nuanced insights than traditional mean-based approaches.

Contribution

The paper develops a new quantile Granger causality approach that distinguishes tail-based connectivity in financial networks, enhancing systemic risk detection.

Findings

Tail-based networks detect risky periods more accurately.

Upper and lower tail networks reveal different market dynamics.

Method outperforms traditional mean-based GC in simulations.

Abstract

In the post-crisis era, financial regulators and policymakers are increasingly interested in data-driven tools to measure systemic risk and to identify systemically important firms. Granger Causality (GC) based techniques to build networks among financial firms using time series of their stock returns have received significant attention in recent years. Existing GC network methods model conditional means, and do not distinguish between connectivity in lower and upper tails of the return distribution - an aspect crucial for systemic risk analysis. We propose statistical methods that measure connectivity in the financial sector using system-wide tail-based analysis and is able to distinguish between connectivity in lower and upper tails of the return distribution. This is achieved using bivariate and multivariate GC analysis based on regular and Lasso penalized quantile regressions, an approach we call quantile Granger causality (QGC). By considering centrality measures of these financial networks, we can assess the build-up of systemic risk and identify risk propagation channels. We provide an asymptotic theory of QGC estimators under a quantile vector autoregressive model, and show its benefit over regular GC analysis on simulated data. We apply our method to the monthly stock returns of large U.S. firms and demonstrate that lower tail based networks can detect systemically risky periods in historical data with higher accuracy than mean-based networks. In a similar analysis of large Indian banks, we find that upper and lower tail networks convey different information and have the potential to distinguish between periods of high connectivity that are governed by positive vs negative news in the market.